×

SHE WAITED YEARS TO HAVE THE FINAL WORD. After Charlie Kirk publicly branded her a “national disgrace” in 2021, Simone Biles remained largely silent. Now, following his death, she has finally responded with a raw, emotional post detailing the personal hell he put her through. Millions are calling it the most courageous and necessary clapback in sports history. Decide for yourself if this was an act of bravery or a step too far.

SHE WAITED YEARS TO HAVE THE FINAL WORD. After Charlie Kirk publicly branded her a “national disgrace” in 2021, Simone Biles remained largely silent. Now, following his death, she has finally responded with a raw, emotional post detailing the personal hell he put her through. Millions are calling it the most courageous and necessary clapback in sports history. Decide for yourself if this was an act of bravery or a step too far.

In society, an unspoken expectation often follows someone’s death: a respectful silence. Regardless of a person’s controversies, grief traditionally comes first, and judgment waits. Yet traditions are not rules, and occasionally they are challenged. Recently, gymnast Simone Biles did just that, igniting debate over the boundaries between mourning, respect, and truth-telling.

Just days after conservative commentator Charlie Kirk’s passing, Biles published a blog post revisiting his criticism of her during the 2021 Tokyo Olympics. The timing divided opinion. To some, it was an act of courage—a refusal to let death erase the harm caused by his words. To others, it felt uncomfortably soon, risking the appearance of insensitivity.

Biles recalled the emotional toll of the Olympics, when she withdrew from events due to the “twisties,” a dangerous mental block. Her decision, widely hailed as a turning point for athlete mental health, was also met with harsh backlash. Kirk, among the loudest critics, branded her unpatriotic and weak. For Biles, those attacks were not fleeting—they left enduring scars. In writing about them now, she underscored how influential voices can cause harm that persists well beyond headlines.

The reactions to her post reveal a cultural divide. Supporters argue Biles is reclaiming her narrative, refusing to let conventions of silence diminish her truth. They see her candor as part of a broader shift that prizes honesty and mental health over social etiquette. Critics, meanwhile, believe her words could have waited. Mourning, they argue, requires space—and immediate critique risks overshadowing loss.

What Biles has done is push the boundaries of public mourning. Her statement forces a difficult question: does death close the door on accountability, or open the way for more complex truths?

By speaking out, Biles adds to her legacy—not only as one of the greatest gymnasts, but as a public figure unafraid to voice uncomfortable realities. Her choice signals a cultural change: silence is no longer the only respectful response to pain.

Post Comment