She rolled her eyes and refused to use the term displayed on the teleprompter😮

During a live BBC broadcast, veteran news presenter **Martine Croxall** made headlines after she appeared to reject a word displayed on her autocue. While reading a report about groups vulnerable to heat-related illnesses, she paused when the script referred to “pregnant people.” Instead, she corrected herself on air, saying “pregnant women,” and even signaled with her eyes as if to underline her choice.

Croxall, 56, has worked with the BBC for more than 30 years. Her decision quickly ignited a wave of responses online. Supporters praised her for standing by her beliefs, while critics accused her of disregarding inclusive language meant to represent non-binary and trans individuals who can also become pregnant.

Author **J.K. Rowling** was among those who publicly backed Croxall, posting on X (formerly Twitter), *“I have a new favourite BBC presenter.”* The post fueled further debate, reflecting the ongoing cultural divide over gender identity and language.

Croxall herself acknowledged the attention, thanking her new followers on social media and admitting she is “braced” for possible conversations with BBC management. She has previously expressed firm views on the matter, stating in past debates that “sex is binary and immutable.”

The incident highlights a broader, ongoing conversation in the UK and beyond about gender, inclusivity, and how public institutions navigate these discussions. For many, Croxall’s on-air correction was a simple assertion of personal conviction. For others, it was a rejection of inclusivity.

What do you think of her choice? Should news presenters strictly follow the script, or do they have the right to deviate when they disagree?